ext_54219 ([identity profile] terrymcgarry.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] tmcg 2007-07-26 02:06 pm (UTC)

That's true, yeah, and I hadn't thought about it like that. Mostly we just weren't interested in having a Big Traditional Wedding; we're both long lapsed from any Church affiliation, I paid my lifetime organize-a-giant-banquet-event dues with the 2000 Nebula Awards weekend in New York, and most of the romantic trappings of the large-scale wedding didn't appeal to either of us. I might have gotten political about boycotting marriage as a U.S. legal institution until people of the same sex can get married anywhere in the country, but that's a whole nother issue. *g* And with this, what I found was that a small and simple wedding can be just as charming and just as beautifully, personally moving as a large one (maybe more so, because you're not as distracted and freaked and exhausted), and that even a small and simple ceremony can quickly threaten to get out of control and turn into a something suspiciously resembling a Big Deal Wedding if you don't do it very fast. Commando Wedding! Surgical Strike! *g*

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org