What is the problem with spelling "definitely"?
My mental spelling mechanism works semi-eidetically. I learned to spell by reading a lot. When I was copyediting romance novels, in the late nineteen-eighties, I became permanently incapable of spelling the word "feisty," because I saw it spelled "fiesty" so many times that it started to look right that way. I fear that the Internet may curse me to a future of double-checking the spelling "definitely" because "definately" has been burned into my optic nerve.
My mental spelling mechanism works semi-eidetically. I learned to spell by reading a lot. When I was copyediting romance novels, in the late nineteen-eighties, I became permanently incapable of spelling the word "feisty," because I saw it spelled "fiesty" so many times that it started to look right that way. I fear that the Internet may curse me to a future of double-checking the spelling "definitely" because "definately" has been burned into my optic nerve.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 02:12 am (UTC)I have little mnemonickish devices, like "man-made" is the only one with a hyphen, so if it's "homemade" or "handmade," no hyphen. And a very ancient Rolodex card taped to the upper lip of my rolltop desk, with a list of frequently occurring words I got tired of having to look up because I didn't trust myself. When Web 10 became Web 11, I had to double-check them all. Very annoying. *g*
no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 02:13 am (UTC)EE sounds that don't follow the rule: Neither weird sheik seizes leisure either.
Non-EE sounds that don't follow the rule: A friend does mischief if he makes a sieve of your handkerchief.
Yes, I know some of those words have alternate pronunciations. But that about covers it.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 01:22 am (UTC)I used to have trouble only with double letters and not with any other common spelling traps, but I'm beginning to have trouble with -ant vs. -ent in any number of words, and I think it's for the same reason you have trouble with 'feisty' -- because I see them wrong more often than I see them right. (And occasionally I find myself having to think twice to know whether to use 'lie' or 'lay.' Alas.)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 02:30 am (UTC)I ended up doing romance novels because a romance editor was the friend-of-a-friend who put in a good word for me and got me my first freelance job. I'd taken a copyediting course through a local grad school's continuing-education program, but the book that turned me on to the idea--Copyediting: A Practical Guide, by Karen Judd, which is back in print--was equally good instruction. I started out on the romance and horror paperbacks that Zebra Books was publishing then, and it was a lot of fun.
Yes, -ant vs. -ent is another one! I commiserate.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 02:24 am (UTC)And it gets worse: If you work for different magazines, they each have a house style. So it's rock 'n' roll one place and rock & roll another. Serial comma yes, serial comma no. I worked for a whole summer on a restaurant guide and virtually memorized their pages-long style sheet, with hundreds of food terms from cuisines around the globe--only to go straight to another food-oriented publication, which had another style sheet, with many of the same terms, all different...So that tarte tatin at one was tarte Tatin at another...etc. etc.
I know that one of the great pleasures should I publish my own book will be saying, "I'm going to spell these words my way, and screw you guys if you don't like it...
Romance novels are pretty low on the list of books I like to work on, but I've certainly done my share...
no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 02:44 am (UTC)New Yorker style was very different from Chicago style, and I went back and forth on a daily basis (sometimes hourly, if I slipped in some freelance work on my lunch break). Then, styles differed among the book publishers that mainly followed Chicago--Tor allowed some things, Del Rey didn't, Bantam had other preferences, and Pocket had a whole set of style sheets just for Trek books. At least I'd flushed most of the AP style from my system after college. But it occurred to me more than once that if I ever tried to work for an academic journal that followed MLA style it would be a gory scene, brains and skull fragments covering the office walls.
Author preference is a joy. So is a publisher that's cool with it. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 03:49 am (UTC)Deb
no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 07:14 pm (UTC)What, you didn't have "chief" burned into your brain from the cover of Silver Chief, Dog of the North??? How could you not??? *g*
(I loved that book so much that I went to abebooks.com a couple of years ago and bought one that looks just like the edition I checked out of my grammar school's library over and over again. It's on the shelf next to Bob, Son of Battle and Lassie Come Home and Jack London, and I need to track down the Alfred Payson Terhune books next.)
Been there, done that
Date: 2005-06-12 03:57 am (UTC)Re: Been there, done that
Date: 2005-06-21 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 05:51 pm (UTC)It seems to be an evil internet virus.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 08:34 pm (UTC)I bet a lot of other people are in the same boat. There are a ton of words that are being mutated into different pronunciations today. I have some older writing colleagues who occasionally stumble upon a word that used to be pronounced one way in the sixties, but is now pronounced another. For example, the word weekend is mutating to the emphasis being placed on the other syllable. And it throws a lot of people off.
Being an anthropologist at heart, more than a grammarian, I'm all for the evolution of language, but then you get to things like "definately" (which I've heard pronounced with a soft "ah" not "ate") and can completely see the confusion that results in aural spelling.
And for the record, I had to look up the word "pronunciation" while writing this, because of my aural-spelling ways. I always want to write "pronunciation" as it should be, but know that it comes from "pronounce" and have a freak out moment.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-14 08:33 pm (UTC)I'm sure you're right. But for the life of me I can't "hear" what that would sound like. Everyone I've ever known has pronounced it the way it's spelled. How on earth did the pronunciation get whacked in the first place, and so uniformly?? Def-in-AT-ly? Why not def-in-UT-ly? "DefinITly" without the "e"?
Rhetorical, of course.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-13 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-24 05:33 am (UTC)paid ("payed"
laid ("layed")
it's and its
weird ("wierd")
separate ("seperate")
and I've seen "supersede" in way too many published books printed instead as "supercede." I'd been guilty in the past of that one myself, years ago.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-04 09:39 pm (UTC)"I'd like to do some work for you."
"Great! Spell 'supersede.'"
"Ophthalmologist" may have been another one.